April 12, 20197 yr Really nice to see you guys enjoying these features! Work started on them back in August last year - so it's great to see them being used after all this time
April 12, 20197 yr 3 minutes ago, Andrew Wilson said: Really nice to see you guys enjoying these features! Work started on them back in August last year - so it's great to see them being used after all this time And it’s great to be using them. Thank you so much!
April 12, 20197 yr Gatwick to Amsterdam. still getting used to the new features. FO is landing us into there today
April 13, 20197 yr 2 hours ago, Markos Papoutsidakis said: Departing rainy LGAV Is the illuminated rain drops default to the fslabs or is it tomato? Looks astonishing
April 13, 20197 yr 1 hour ago, Alexander_Halbritter said: Is the illuminated rain drops default to the fslabs or is it tomato? Looks astonishing It's the reflection using the tomato profiles downloaded from the forum.
April 14, 20197 yr 8 hours ago, Michael Briner said: How did you manage to get it even better ? Let's see what pbr brings to the table. Might get interesting. I hope the hype is real. I have no experience with pbr.
April 14, 20197 yr Approaching London Luton: Arrived at Berlin: Approaching La Palma Departing Berlin:
April 14, 20197 yr First flight with the update but still in 4.4. I am speachless impressed! How is it possible to "improve" this even further?
April 14, 20197 yr 1 hour ago, Timm Rehberg said: How is it possible to "improve" this even further? Exactly the same what I thought when starting it up for the first time.
April 14, 20197 yr 2 hours ago, Timm Rehberg said: How is it possible to "improve" this even further? Oh just you wait and see what we've done with the A321
April 14, 20197 yr 2 minutes ago, Andrew Wilson said: Oh just you wait and see what we've done with the A321 I'm guessing its nearly ready then!
April 14, 20197 yr All of you with raindrops on your VC, did you have to activate something? Because I don't have any raindrops on my windshield on the latest update for some reason?
April 15, 20197 yr 9 hours ago, Andrew Wilson said: Oh just you wait and see what we've done with the A321 psssssh! Give us time to enjoy everything done with v2.0.2.347 first!!! DAMN! Now you started something .. (Note the tense he uses )
April 15, 20197 yr 19 minutes ago, Timm Rehberg said: DAMN! Now you started something .. (Note the tense he uses ) Same thoughts here;)
April 15, 20197 yr Author 3 hours ago, Timm Rehberg said: psssssh! Give us time to enjoy everything done with v2.0.2.347 first!!! Nah...it's never too soon for the A321 Already looking forward to the long one.
April 15, 20197 yr 9 hours ago, Tobias Gövert said: Nah...it's never too soon for the A321 Already looking forward to the long one. I think @Andrew Wilson wants to keep it for his own
April 15, 20197 yr Moooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooon over a chilly Denmark flying home to a IRN-BRU5A arrival !
April 15, 20197 yr First ever screenshot of the upcoming FSL A321-X with @Andrew Wilson on the controls!* *take this a joke. Its just andrew flying online and this is a MTL model by FlAI.
April 15, 20197 yr 38 minutes ago, Timm Rehberg said: First ever screenshot of the upcoming FSL A321-X with @Andrew Wilson on the controls!* *take this a joke. Its just andrew flying online and this is a MTL model by FlAI. Damn, it should have done a screenshot of his telex Happy landing Andrew!
April 15, 20197 yr 1 hour ago, Timm Rehberg said: I think @Andrew Wilson wants to keep it for his own STALKER!
April 16, 20197 yr looks like some powdered sugar. this was just a test using in sim weather set to heavy snow. it took 1 or two seconds or so to load the snow on the fuselage. engine temp was 10 Celsius due to the GPU on state.
April 16, 20197 yr One thing I have always found strange about the FSL before, and now sadly still after the 'model update'...How can anyone think this overly pronounced line is realistic? It is in the default paintkit, and it exists in the model too, so even when I tried removing it in the respective texture files, it would still be there. I just don't see why anyone creating the model and the paintkit would happily accept such an inaccurate depiction of a minor visual feature and let it ruin the aesthetics of the entire aircraft? (brand new paint uploaded today) Through my job in ramp handling I've been up close with MSNs both brand new and 'how can this thing still fly' - old. Never have I noticed this detail even remotely as striking as in the FSL. Of course, it is there - on more beaten airframes, like early EIS1s, you might actually notice it! On newer birds, it takes some pretty over the top post processing to make it visible, like I did in this image: https://www.airplane-pictures.net/photo/657076/d-abzf-air-berlin-airbus-a320/ And in some cases, even heavy post-processing, increasing the contrast and pushing the details, doesn't cut it: https://www.airplane-pictures.net/photo/646912/d-agwf-germanwings-airbus-a319/ So yeah, it exists, and the fuselage is probably sewn together along that line in some way, but the way it is modelled makes me wonder if any real A320 was used as a reference at all.
April 16, 20197 yr It is NOT in the model. It is in the bump texture which you can happily edit. If you wish, you can make it disappear completely.
April 16, 20197 yr 3 minutes ago, Marvin Toepfer said: Look here. looks really good to me Some but not all painters iron it out a little.
April 16, 20197 yr 9 minutes ago, NilsUnger said: It is NOT in the model. It is in the bump texture which you can happily edit. If you wish, you can make it disappear completely. I'll add this to the list of things I can re-adjust and tweak after each update (=reinstall)...
