Todd Harrell Posted March 6, 2017 Posted March 6, 2017 Yes, you will have to buy the new version. No different that going from v1 to v2 to v3. All major versions have to be purchased. 1 Quote
Ju_li_en Ke_ml_er Posted March 9, 2017 Posted March 9, 2017 https://fselite.net/news/prepare3ds-next-version-will-64bit/ P3D 64 bits confirmed. Quote
S_r_d_a_n K_o_s_t_i_c Posted March 9, 2017 Posted March 9, 2017 This *year*... don't hold your breath. Quote
Christian Baldauf Posted March 15, 2017 Posted March 15, 2017 On 23. Februar 2017 at 9:44 AM, tonaz said: Actually, in a technical way of speaking, it IS history. Since the moment P3D started using Dx11. I will never understand people keep on using FSX. Does anybody of you have at least some concerns when buying P3D from a company belonging to the weapons industry? I know that Boeing and Airbus and perhaps also Microsoft play a role in that scene, but isn't there a difference between being used by the military and being a part of the military? Don't get me wrong, I just wanted to say that I haven't moved to P3D also for that reason. Maybe this is making too much out of it, but the nasty taste remains at the moment (for me). 1 Quote
Rafal Haczek Posted March 15, 2017 Posted March 15, 2017 5 hours ago, kriggelb said: Does anybody of you have at least some concerns Yes. I do. Just telling you so that you can know you're not alone. I don't want to write more as this would most likely be a slippery topic for many. Quote
Tomoya Sasaki Posted March 19, 2017 Posted March 19, 2017 I have a dream. Installing FSL A320 and Drzewiecki Design New York City. Setting to 4K texture option. Then after, go to LaGuardia and trying Hudson river challenge. This dream come to soon !! Quote
M_i_k_e_V_o_g Posted March 19, 2017 Posted March 19, 2017 On 15/03/2017 at 5:31 PM, kriggelb said: Does anybody of you have at least some concerns when buying P3D from a company belonging to the weapons industry? I know that Boeing and Airbus and perhaps also Microsoft play a role in that scene, but isn't there a difference between being used by the military and being a part of the military? Don't get me wrong, I just wanted to say that I haven't moved to P3D also for that reason. Maybe this is making too much out of it, but the nasty taste remains at the moment (for me). You'll be amazed by how much of the technology that you use in daily life stems from military R&D. A lot of civil applications started their life as a part of a military project or indeed are derived from one. No doubt one's life would look a whole lot different if one decided to shun all that has military technology in it. Do you not have that bitter taste when using your smartphone? after all, does it not have the very same GPS that's intended to guide cruise missiles? 1 Quote
Jonathan Fong Posted March 19, 2017 Posted March 19, 2017 On 3/15/2017 at 11:31 PM, kriggelb said: Does anybody of you have at least some concerns when buying P3D from a company belonging to the weapons industry? I know that Boeing and Airbus and perhaps also Microsoft play a role in that scene, but isn't there a difference between being used by the military and being a part of the military? Don't get me wrong, I just wanted to say that I haven't moved to P3D also for that reason. Maybe this is making too much out of it, but the nasty taste remains at the moment (for me). LM isn't part of the military at all - it's its own separate company. They only have contracts with the military, which many companies do - Boeing and Airbus have both worked with the US military as well, the former very much so (see the F/A-18, KC-135, etc.). By that logic, flying on any of their civilian planes would be immoral too. LM also has history in the civil aviation industry - just look at the L-1011 and the Constellation. 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.