Alexander_Halbritter 33 Posted January 9, 2020 Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 On the 321 I notice that the CG when creating the flightplan via simbrief is far forward. It always is between 18 and 24%. Is there a way to change this as in real life you would want the CG to be far more towards the rear for better fuel economy and performance. Link to post
Koen Meier 1352 Posted January 9, 2020 Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 How are you loading the bus. Ie cargo. As fslabs always aims for a neutral position. Link to post
Alexander_Halbritter 33 Posted January 9, 2020 Author Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 I load load the fligytplan via init request and load the cargo via the AOC (and gsx) and I might add I never had this problem in the 320/319 using the same loading technique Link to post
Koen Meier 1352 Posted January 9, 2020 Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 the loadsheet should always have a more neautral cg value but this is dependent on the weight. Link to post
Camille MOUCHEL 123 Posted January 9, 2020 Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 34 minutes ago, Alexander_Halbritter said: On the 321 I notice that the CG when creating the flightplan via simbrief is far forward. It always is between 18 and 24%. Is there a way to change this as in real life you would want the CG to be far more towards the rear for better fuel economy and performance. with the A321 and even the A319, the CG is always above 30% Link to post
Alexander_Halbritter 33 Posted January 9, 2020 Author Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 I know that, that’s why I’m asking. Never got more than 24% MAC in the 321, 320 worked like a Charme. Should be way aft. Is there a way to change it? I noticed that the baggage of the pax is in one cargo compartment instead of evenly distributed Link to post
Camille MOUCHEL 123 Posted January 9, 2020 Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 5 minutes ago, Alexander_Halbritter said: I know that, that’s why I’m asking. Never got more than 24% MAC in the 321, 320 worked like a Charme. Should be way aft. Is there a way to change it? I noticed that the baggage of the pax is in one cargo compartment instead of evenly distributed I don't know I use simbrief, don't why the fslabs doesn't try to "neutrlize the CG", but you can then do it manually Link to post
Koen Meier 1352 Posted January 9, 2020 Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 fslabs tries to auto-balance the load so that it trims slightly down or up dependent on the load. Link to post
Alexander_Halbritter 33 Posted January 9, 2020 Author Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 Well, than this autobalancing is failing for me somehow :D Take off trim is always around UP2.0. I will provide screenshots when doing my next flight. Link to post
Camille MOUCHEL 123 Posted January 9, 2020 Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 18 minutes ago, Alexander_Halbritter said: Well, than this autobalancing is failing for me somehow :D Take off trim is always around UP2.0. I will provide screenshots when doing my next flight. well I'm alway between -1.0 and +1.0 Link to post
Alexander_Halbritter 33 Posted January 9, 2020 Author Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 thats how it loads the ZFM imported using the AOC and simbrief... Link to post
Koen Meier 1352 Posted January 9, 2020 Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 You appear to be very light for an a321 so compensation via cargo isn’t effective. I did a flight between heathrow and Amsterdam which I had a ZFW of 71.1 tonnes. That was 218 pax and 800 cargo totaling 21757 kg of payload. Link to post
Alexander_Halbritter 33 Posted January 9, 2020 Author Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 Well Lufthansa only has 200 seats. I got 170 pax at 84kg each. But I think I know what causes it. I have simbrief set to 84kg per passenger. But i forgot to add the weight of their baggage. In the next leg I will report back if that actually solves it Link to post
Koen Meier 1352 Posted January 9, 2020 Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 Planespotters say 205. Seatguru says 192 which is less reliable I think. And Lufthansa website says 200. Link to post
Camille MOUCHEL 123 Posted January 9, 2020 Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 with simbrief flpl, fslab gave me a ZFWCG of 29.5 ...... for the A319 Link to post
Luca Schwahn 30 Posted January 9, 2020 Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 5 hours ago, Koen Meier said: Planespotters say 205. Seatguru says 192 which is less reliable I think. And Lufthansa website says 200. Yes, but LH also counts the blocked middle seat in Business Class as one seat (the light grey one without a cross) . On a normal flight with full Business Class around 190 passengers would fit as a maximum. I think the amount of Business Class seats can easily be changed before the flights as there is mostly no difference between Eco and Business, at least on Lufthansa‘s A320-Family fleet. So they can adjust there capacity pretty good. Link to post
Andrew Wilson 7382 Posted January 9, 2020 Report Share Posted January 9, 2020 The logic targets a MACTOW of 30%. Link to post
Alexander_Halbritter 33 Posted January 10, 2020 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2020 16 hours ago, Andrew Wilson said: The logic targets a MACTOW of 30%. re-set the simbrief passenger weight to 104kg (default value), now it is working again. TOCG around 27%. Link to post
Ross McDonagh 57 Posted Sunday at 01:07 AM Report Share Posted Sunday at 01:07 AM On 1/9/2020 at 6:07 PM, Andrew Wilson said: The logic targets a MACTOW of 30%. Hate to revive this-but in the A321, I’ve definitely got this issue consistently when I fly my 200 pax limited A321 and my SB pax are at 230lb (84kg) TOCG was 23.8% for me and usually is in that range in the A321. I do all my stuff via SB/FSLabs link I’ve attached a pic of the release, Loadsheet and load out in payload (after an hour of flight) as well as the Link to post
Ross McDonagh 57 Posted Sunday at 01:08 AM Report Share Posted Sunday at 01:08 AM Edit Post: Attaching my simbrief fleet page as well in case it’s helpful Link to post
Ross McDonagh 57 Posted Sunday at 04:43 AM Report Share Posted Sunday at 04:43 AM CC: the above to Loadmaster @Norman Blackburn Link to post
Norman Blackburn 3377 Posted Sunday at 09:47 AM Report Share Posted Sunday at 09:47 AM 230lbs is 105KG, not 84. 84KG is just under 185lbs Link to post
Recommended Posts