Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'fps'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • General
    • Announcements
    • General Forum
    • FSL Control Center Discussion
  • Aircraft
    • Concorde-X
    • A3xx Master Series
    • Screenshots
  • Tools
    • FSL Hardware Interface
    • FSL Spotlights
  • Cockpit Building
    • Chat about cockpit building
  • easyJet Crew's easyForum
  • British Airways's The BA Club
  • Aegean Airlines's The Pub of Accord
  • Wizz Air's Topics
  • My little software corner's Developments


  • A319-X Liveries
    • PBR User Submitted Liveries
    • Older Non PBR Liveries
  • A320-X Liveries
    • Older non PBR Liveries
    • FSX & P3Dv3 Liveries
  • A321-X Liveries
    • User Submitted Liveries
  • A3XX Misc Files
    • Cabin Textures
    • EFB Backgrounds
    • A320-X - Unsupported Mods
    • Utilities
  • Concorde-X Files
  • FSL Aircraft Paint Kits
  • Spotlights
  • Hardware Interface for Prepar3D v4 & v5
  • Legacy Interfaces
  • Olympic Air Virtual's Files
  • Wizz Air's Files
  • Eurowings Crew's Configs / Textures / Sounds
  • Eurowings Crew's Operational Files
  • My little software corner's Downloads

Product Groups

There are no results to display.

Find results in...

Find results that contain...

Date Created

  • Start


Last Updated

  • Start


Filter by number of...

Found 24 results

  1. samuel spowage

    FSLABS A320 FPS sudden drop

    Hi, I used to be able to run the fslabs a320 at a steady non stuttery 30fps in the VC, However recently it keeps stuttering and cant seem to get above 15fps and stuttering. Its making it unflyable. Ive tried reinstalling it and tried reistalling P3D v5.1 however its made no effect. This is a shame as really enjoy flying the FSlabs and i can't with such low FPS. Thanks Sam
  2. Janis Rieger

    How well can I run the FSL A321-X?

    Hello dear flight simmers, First of all I am new to this forum and I guess this is the right section to post it. Yesterday, I purchased a new PC and I´d like to know how well I could run the A321 for P3Dv5 (It doesn´t work for FSX:SE, does it?). --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Specs: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 (17,828 Passmark CPU points) RX 5700XT 8GB VRAM (16,729 Passmark CPU points) 32GB RAM 3200MHz 1TB M.2 SSD (R:2000MB/s W:1700MB/s) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- According to Passmark my PC will exceed the recommended specs by over twice the amound of points. So I´m sure that I can run it... but how well? I don´t plan to add any addons besides GSX and some other aircraft addons and my perfect goal would be to achieve 40FPS no matter where I fly (I have no idea if that is even possible with such a complex aircraft) It may be that this question has been ask a hundred times by now and I also tried to look on youtube to get a feeling which FPS I can expect from which specs, but every youtuber either has a much better system than mine or lots of graphic/scenery addons that influence the performance. I want to be 101% dead sure before investing 200$ into the A321, so if anyone has the same or a similar system as me, I´d apreaciate if you could share your experience with me. Kind regards and thanks in advance!
  3. Frederik Verpoest

    A320 performance question

    Upon visiting the FSLabs stand at the FlightSimShow in Cosford, I was blown away by the A320-X. I currently fly only PMDG aircraft, and would like to expand my fleet to include a320. The amount of realism makes the a320 very appealing. However, before purchasing I had a question about the performance. I have been told that my computer is capable of running the addon however I wanted to check with other users. I currently run FSX:SE on complete default, except for some REX ground and sky textures, as well as some freeware sceneries, (SunSkyJet KPHL), and the UK2000 demo freewares I use. Specs: I5-9600k @3.7gHZ RTX 2060 16gb RAM DDR4 I currently get around 25-32 fps in the PMDG 744 at UK2000 Heathrow and around 27-40 at UK2000 Gatwick, what would be a reasonable estimate for the FSLabs? I am aware this is system dependent. Also, if you have any FPS tips they would be VERY much appreciated Thanks for your inputs!

    A320 black screen

    Hello FSLAB team, I have the following problem, I start the plane a319/a320 when I change the camera as I show in the video and the images my screen stays black for 4 or 5 seconds, later the fps fall to 1 and 2, this happens with the new update, I have my computer with updated drivers and my graphical drivers, I9 9990K/ Z390ELITE/32GB RAM DDR4 CORSAIR/ RTX2080 SUPER / SSD M2 EVO SAMSUNG 970/ Some solution.. I9 Lockheed_Martin®_Prepar3D®_v4_with_WideServer__waiting_for_clients_2019-10-16_21-01-58.mp4

    Hope for next upgrade

    First of all, i am very appreciate that FSL offer so high quality for us. Everything is so realistic. But only one thing always feel unsatisfied-the fps. I know my old PC is not achieve the lowest requirement. But now my new PC is still like this. My new PC Hardware: I7 8700K+ 1080TI+ 32G RAM DDR4 3200+ 500G SSD+ 4T HHD My p3d seeting as below: p3d v4.3; Fsl 320 v2.0.1.266 I don't think my setting is too high. But my fps is not too high like my old pc. As usual, Pmdg cold and dark i can get 60-70 fps while FSL only 40-50. But after star aircraft the fps will drop 10-15. Because i often fly Asia area, so the fps just ok. But if i try to fly to UK or Amsterdam that the fps will be very terrible. But other addon not any problems in these area. There is many time i think that is my setting has problems. But no matter how i try, the fps still can get good enough. So i notice that 320 will get same feature to 319 and 321. But i hope fsl also can pay more attention to the fps optimization. It will be perfect. And we also hope you can bring more and more high quality Airbus addon for us. Cheers
  6. Jack Sparrowhawk

    P3Dv4 and 8gb RAM

    Hello, I am very interested to purchase this product! I am just wondering on how my PC would run with 8GB worth of ram... I saw on the website it said: '<Minimum 16gb of RAM' Is 8gb enough? What does RAM do exactly in P3D V4? Does this affect performance ? I would love to get this aircraft! I'm too scared to purchase in case of the bad FPS. By watching videos online with the difference performance with the 8gb and 16gb I don' notice a big change in FPS or stutters for example... All I can see is maybe a 4-8fps decrease. My setup is: Intel Core I5-4590 GTX760 4K monitor 8GB of Ram Installed Thanks, Jack Sparrowhawk.
  7. kelvfrancis


    Hi, I have tried both the FSL A320 with and without spotlights, the result that FSL spotlights causes major performance drop in fps. Is there any solution beacsue i really need fsl spotlight for night ops. Any help would be appreciated.
  8. 1) Switch scenery to 'normal' 2) Turn FSX autogen to 'off' 3) Turn of the XBox DVR through the Registery Editor in Windows 10 - majorly hits your FPS. 4) Turn OFF the F/Os side PFD, ND and FMGS. You know and I know, we are not going to be looking at those other screens when flying. 5) Do not run Google Chrome especially or any memory consuming application running in the background. If you love the aircraft, you wouldn't care about the scenery too much and one side is enough to fly this aircraft and have a great feel of the Airbus 320. Trust me, it is worth it. I started with having 7 fps and now have an fps of 20-24. I cannot say that I have this beautiful looking amazing sim because I use freeware scenery and no ORBX stuff. However, I do have a functional simulator. I can fly online on VATSIM without any problems, eargasm on TOGA of the IAEs, simulate failures, do circuits etc. My cockpit still looks great and that is all I care about. If you're like me, give it a go. Don't hold yourself back because you have a shitty PC. I hope someday I'll be in the real thing and would not have to worry about fps and scenery so much and would remember how much I learnt from this great product.
  9. Dave Hoffman

    VAS and Performance tips!

    Hello all, I'm a new customer to FlightSimLabs, and I'm not disappointed. I have use both the boxed versions of FSX, and FSX-SE, and am now running Prepar3D and trying not to look back. Over the years, and in conference with a friend of mine who is also an avid simmer, I have discovered some performance enhancing techniques for your sim. Some of these can be easily found on the internet, but here, I am going to focus on P3D, and without getting too specific as to my system settings. The reason being that P3D is more stable than FSX, and is delicate, but more fault-tolerant. I've got a LOT of stuff installed on it and I'm getting incredible performance, including with the A32X. Hyperthreading: If you use a processor, either Intel or AMD, and it's capable of running more than one thread per core, the best thing you can do is TURN IT OFF! You heard right. Hyperthreading or multithreading is great for running a bunch of desktop applications in a more harmonious manner, but we're talking about an engine that was developed for use with single-core processors. Do a test with the A320 at an addon airport with your sim "fully loaded" at a gate, then go into your BIOS and turn off hyperthreading, and try the EXACT same setup again, and you'll have to pick your jaw up off the floor with the memory you will save. Frame Limiter: I'm no hardware expert, but from what I understand of frame limiters, they work on the level of microscopic time and ultimately smooth out the performance that you are getting by doing the following. Frame limiters save the time of outputting frames they otherwise would have had they not been limited, and allocate those nanoseconds to doing other processes, ultimately smoothing your performance, and adding an element of scheduling to what your graphics card is doing. 30FPS is less than desirable in today's world, but a smooth 30FPS is very desirable in a flight simulator. There is NO good reason to use the frame limiter inside ANY of these sims. They do NOT work, so set them to "Unlimited." Use a graphics card utility such as the NVidia Control panel to set application specific frame limits. Use a frame rate that is right at, or half of your monitor's refresh rate. Mine's 60, so 60 or 30 would be applicable to me. Vertical sync should be on in the application to eliminate tearing (visible when viewing a whirling propeller). SLI/CrossfireX: I've got two video cards in my rig, and love the performance of having a second GPU doing some of the work. However, the application engine was developed before this technology came to be fruitful. Using SLI in P3D or FSX is basically a placebo effect. You will barely notice any effect in P3D, and it is also said that it can DECREASE performance in FSX. If you have an NVidia card, you can change the application specific setting "SLI Rendering Mode" to "Single GPU" Setting it this way also eliminates flickering of lights, smoke, and soft particles. It also helps in OBS if you're a streamer. Using SLI will cause OBS to render only half of your frames, so your broadcast will be choppy. If you're broadcasting at 30FPS, the app will run at 15 and look more like a slide show. Remember, SINGLE GPU! AffinityMast tweak: With regards to .CFG tweaks, less is more with P3D. With P3D and FSX-SE, use the double-slash "//" to comment out the affinitymask tweak. P3D and FSX-SE do a pretty good job of selecting the processors they want to run on, often you will get better performance NOT using the tweak. .CFG tweaks: Again, less is more. Try these: Under [GRAPHICS], set TEXTURE_MAX_LOAD=2048. This is a reasonable compromise between full HD and looking like dog food. We'd all like to be able to fly in 4K, but not with these sims. Don't let any installers change that value when offered. Under [DISPLAY], TEXTURE_BANDWIDTH_MULTI=40. Some guides have you set this higher, and to be honest, it has been my personal experience that the higher I set this, the more blurries I get. I always thought it increased a multiplier of some kind and therefore, texture throughput, but this is what helped me. YMMV. Under [MAIN], FIBER_FRAME_TIME_FRACTION=0.33, this is the default value. Some guides recommend setting this to 0.01 to increase frame rate. What this does is allocate a portion of the process's thread time to rendering texture. If you want to get rid of blurries, keep this at 0.33. DO NOT SET IT TO ZERO. But, play with it, YMMV. I've found blurries the lower I set it, and found no value to setting it higher. Placebo? Under [TERRAIN], TERRAIN_MAX_AUTOGEN_TREES_PER_CELL=4500, try reducing to 3000. TERRAIN_MAX_AUTOGEN_BUILDINGS _PER_CELL=3000, try reducing to 2000. May save you some VAS, and you won't notice much difference. Sliders: The VAS killer is Level of Detail radius. P3D is good at exceeding what FSX can do with the slider. FSX Max right position was LOD=4.50, P3D is higher. The farther to the right you slide this, the more miserable your VAS usage will be. Keep it moderate. Mine is a 5.5, but comes down for graphics preset when flying the 'Bus. If you can't read taxiway markings: such as in ORBX sceneries that use photoreal technology, sliding this up to 15 or 7cm per pixel will help alleviate this, and won't cost much VAS. Autogen: Both of these sliders can save you a little bit if you knock them down. If you're flying a tube-liner then you won't be looking down at trees or buildings, you'll be busy managing the flight deck, only to get a quick glimpse out the window. You can turn them down to the midpoint to save some overhead. Scenery Complexity: A note about this; you can turn it down to save some overhead, but if you're missing buildings or jetways at some airports, turning this up might help restore them. Finally, just remember these last few things with regard to scenery. Like anyone that innovates, publishers try different things to be fhe first to bring something new to the market. Sometimes they fail. There are different sceneries from the same publisher that are sluggers when it comes to memory, performance, or both. Some have hotfixes or updates, and some don't acknowledge there's even a problem. Some refine their product, and some ask you to make concessions in other areas. Personally, I'm still trying to work out how people can fly into JFK at a VATSIM event. I have to offer a ritual sacrifice to the OOM gods to get into New York, in any airplane. Hope this helps, and happy landings.
  10. Hi everyone, Following on from my earlier thread, now archived: fps-versus-flight-phase-graphed , I attach a plot of FPS versus flight phase for the sector VEBN-VNKT as flown on my system with the latest version As before, the graph displays average FPS, and normalized IAS and Flight Level versus Elapsed Time / Flight-Phase on a flight from VEBN to VNKT. There does not appear to be any significant change in performance from the previous version (v.192) There is no dependency of FPS on flight-phase: once the aircraft begins taxiing out, the FPS remains within a narrow band: 25-30, all the way up to the taxi-in at the destination.
  11. Hi Guys. I like to buy the new A320 X from FSLabs. How ist the Performance? Is it better or worse then the AS A320?
  12. Luis Oswaldo Bethencourt

    For those with low FPS

    Hello people This is for those with low end computers and striving to get a few extra FPS to get your FSL experience a bit better. You know who you are. I have disabled the PFD and the ND at the 1st officer seat, and I believe I have gained a few extra FPS (5 fps avg) I dare to say that i´ve finally gotten close enough to the confort zone while flying this puppy!! I thought it would be worth to mention here, so maybe someone can try and verify if it is possible to replicate my results. Needless to say, FSL will not approve this, since it is a modification of their panel.cfg file, but as long as you make a backup of your original panel.cfg file and you JUST comment the 2 lines i will point out, you should not have any issues. (After all, this is a novice/rookie modification, we´re not doing rocket science here) Go to your FSX folder, (wherever your sim is, just locate the root folder) and then go to either one of these two folders (whatever engine variant you want to try this on) FS_ROOT\SimObjects\Airplanes\FSLabs A320 CFM\Panel FS_ROOT\SimObjects\Airplanes\FSLabs A320 IAE\Panel Please make a backup of your panel.cfg located there. Call it panel.cfg.original or something that will help you identifying the file. Then just edit the panel.cfg (with notepad, no Wordpad or any other text editor which might alter the plain text format of this file), scroll a bit down till you locate the following: ////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Main Panel DUs ////////////////////////////////////////////////// [VCockpit01] size_mm=1024,1024 pixel_size=768,768 texture=$DUPFDND background_color=0,0,0 gauge00=..\..\FSLabs A32X\FSL_A32XX!Controller, 0, 0, 0, 0 gauge01=..\..\FSLabs A32X\FSL_A32XX!LCDScreen_1, 56, 56, 400, 400, F0.85 gauge02=..\..\FSLabs A32X\FSL_A32XX!LCDScreen_2, 568, 56, 400, 400, F0.85 gauge03=..\..\FSLabs A32X\FSL_A32XX!LCDScreen_5, 56, 568, 400, 400, F0.85 gauge04=..\..\FSLabs A32X\FSL_A32XX!LCDScreen_6, 568, 568, 400, 400, F0.85 You see those last two lines? gauge03 and 04? those are the 1st officer PDF and ND. COmment them with // at the beginning of the line and save the file. They should look like this: gauge00=..\..\FSLabs A32X\FSL_A32XX!Controller, 0, 0, 0, 0 gauge01=..\..\FSLabs A32X\FSL_A32XX!LCDScreen_1, 56, 56, 400, 400, F0.85 gauge02=..\..\FSLabs A32X\FSL_A32XX!LCDScreen_2, 568, 56, 400, 400, F0.85 //gauge03=..\..\FSLabs A32X\FSL_A32XX!LCDScreen_5, 56, 568, 400, 400, F0.85 //gauge04=..\..\FSLabs A32X\FSL_A32XX!LCDScreen_6, 568, 568, 400, 400, F0.85 Then try to fly the bird. Please let me know if I am just blind, if I am on one of my upbeat overoptimistic days.. of if this really does something. I am sure I am getting a few more fps, not a lot, but enough for me to say I am able to ride the full 9 yards now . At least this works for me. Again, FSL will not likely approve this. After all, if you don´t know what you are doing you might screw up the panel, but again, this is basic file edition. So this is up to you guys. Hope it wont be a problem for FSL if I display part of their panel.cfg on this thread... All the best Luis
  13. Hi all, after my last post and a lot of suggestions I gave the bus a last chance and tried to find a workaround to get him running with acceptable FPS. Here my personal solution: Uninstall FSLabs spotlight (FPS Killer) Uninstall and get rid of ezdok (FSX and performance killer) use now simplecam (cheaper and stable but no outside view) but TBH wich pilot is outside the plane during a flight. Use AutoHideMouseCursor (Curser hides after 2 sec inactivity) Makes a difference vom 10 -15 FPS is cursor hide or not (Known FSX bug) Config my keyboard settings, so I can use some commands and knobs via keyboard. Flying in window mode as suggested and if not used move the cursor to the top of the screen outside FSX (Menubar on the top) Glance around with the coolie hat. Now I'm able to fly between 24 (takeoff) 45 (crz) 20 - 24 (decent and landing) FPS It's ok now from my side, still in hope future updates will increase the FPS so I'm able to use spotlight as well. (So I can use the bus at night as well) My settings: Scenery-Very dense. Autogen-dense: Mesh all slider right Water low 1: AA and bilinear filtering on ORBX Global, Vector, Europe LC, ASN, ProAtcX, GSX, UT2 set to 50% traffic, Steves DX10 fixer (no nvida inspector cos this conflicts with Enigma (Software protection from FSLabs), No payware airports (all freeware or REX Airports HD by default airports) Intel I5 4550, Nvidia GTX755 1024MB, 8GB DDR3 Ram All the best Frank
  14. Miguel Delgado


    Good night, My name is Miguel Delgado and I´ve purchased the A320-X. I had installed in a FSX:SE version updated, with just FSUIPC added, also my SO is Windows 7 Ultimate x64 also recently installed with FSX, TS3, Xplane 11 and firefox. My PC is a i5-4570, 16GB RAM 1600MHz, AMD R9 270-X, CM 750W 80 Plus. When I installed this product I was running at 5fps with no addons more than FSUIPC, with no added scenery, with the default settings. Then I found this topic: And I did everything it says in that topic and nothing really changed, 1 or maybe 2 frames more. Then I lower the FSX settings to the minimum, every single setting was set to its lower value, and even with that, with all textures and all scenery pixelated it was running to 20 fps. My hardware is worth 800 Euros and is 1 and a half years old, with no overclocking. I really need help to improve this results, otherwise I´ll have to ask to refund because this is actually unflyable. Thank you for your time, and have a good day, Miguel
  15. Chakko Kovoor

    FPS versus Flight Phase graphed

    Hi everyone, I have a 6-year-old WidevieW-based system comprising a (desktop) SERVER: i7-950 (3.06-3.33 GHz), 12GB RAM, 2 x 1GB GTX 260 cards, 2 x Matrox Dual Head-to-Go running 6 touchscreen monitors (1920x1080) over which I have opened, undocked, and distributed ALL the A320-X 2-D panels simultaneously in windowed mode. This SERVER does not display any scenery, so texture resolution etc. is deliberately kept very low, in fact TEXTURE_MAX_LOAD = 64. The task of generating and displaying scenery at normal resolutions is relegated to the 7+1 = 8 networked scenery clients, one of which displays an external locked spot view. Each of these client (notebook) systems is based on an i7-processor and a 2GB graphics card, but none of them runs the A320-X. My SERVER, which effortlessly manages the PMDG 737 NGX and the 777X in similar 2-D modes, does struggle to run the A320-X, and frame-rates vary from 60 fps with the cold-and-dark aircraft, down to 16 fps on the take-off and climb. However, because WidevieW is able to compensate for variations in SERVER fps I can still fly the aircraft (even hand-fly) in moderately dense scenery areas, because the CLIENTS are not running the A320X, and give me a locked FPS of 30 in virtually all circumstances, irrespective of the performance of the SERVER. The reason I have described my hardware is to clarify that the effect of the A320-X on my system is quite independent of any scenery-generation requirements. I wrote an FSUIPC-LUA script to monitor the average FPS versus IAS and ALTITUDE in order to gain an understanding of how this aircraft affects my system. I thought the graph might interest others in this community: The graph displays AVERAGED SERVER FPS directly, and normalized Flight Level and IAS for the A320-X on a flight from VIBN to VNKT. It shows how the fps starts at ~55 in cold and dark, then falls to ~40 and further to ~35 as the systems are started up. During the TAXI-OUT it falls further to ~20. The TAKE-OFF run and initial CLIMB-OUT see a further fall to ~16, but the FPS rises again to 20+ during the CRUISE. The DESCENT and LANDING phases, like the Take-Off and Climb phases see a return to ~16 fps. The TAXI-IN shows a return to ~40 fps levels. Note: the FPS displayed here is an average FPS (I used a simple moving-average method, over 120 data points at a time, sampled at 10 Hz), in order to smooth out the spikes. Regards,
  16. AlesCZ

    What is wrong with my computer?

    Hi folks, I have some trouble with performance A320X. I have bought a lot of aircraft (AS A320 / A321, A320 BBS, BBS widebody, CS L-1011, 777 ... etc.). All aircraft are running smoothly with high FPS in every situation. Only A320X is terrible. Is there any tweak for A320X? AS Airbus tweak example greatly helped disable weather radar in a text file. Currently I have a clean install of FSX, medium low settings, installed only A320X and you can not achieve a stable 30FPS. During the take off and flight my FPS drops to below 20 and simulator stutters. One more thing, when I turn off flight, A320X again reloads all DLLs, FSX me again asks if I want to quit flying, and simulator freeze. It must be shut down in the Task Manager. What's wrong with my computer? My computer specs: i7 4790k (4.5Ghz HT) GTX 780 16GB RAM SSD FSX SE DX10 (REX 4 Direct, A320X) FSX.cfg: Poolsize=0 UsePools=0 HIGHMEMFIX=1 TEXTURE_MAX_LOAD=2048 FIBER_FRAME_TIME_FRACTION=0.1 Without these improvements it is un-flyable
  17. Jose_Monteiro

    Performance: 2d vs 3d cockpit...

    Well, to start I am not ( yet ) and FSLabs user. I actually haven't even installed FSX:SE again and am awaiting the release of the P3D version to read user comments and decide what to do ... My system is rather mid-low level ( i5 2500 @ 3,3 GHz from 2011 ) and although I have 16 GB DDR3 RAM and a GTX 960 4GB GDDR5 graphics card, I think I will have to be cautious with my install... My FSX is FSX:SE 1) I have the dx10 fixer, so, I believe I should always install it even if I do not plan to use ANY of the fancy graphics ( shadows et al... ), because I read that it is lighter on VAS... Can you guys confirm this ? 2) I don't mind running the Airbus in 2d panel mode, and I actually thought this was the lighter way, but yesterday I read somewhere that severe FPS degradation could result from undocking instruments in 2d panel and specially when resizing them ? Is this true ? Should I then opt for the 3d panel instead ? 3) Windowed vs Full Screen mode is the other problem I have. I read that windowed performs better, but I always experienced better performance when running FSX:SE in full screen mode, using VSync ( 1/ 2 ) ... so, I really don't know what to think about this windowed vs full screen ... optimization. What can you had to my doubts :-) ?
  18. Zeljko Budovic

    just found low FPS cause

    Anyway, don't expect some miracle solution. But there is a compromise that can be made, and it helps FPS. After i tried everything, i found that displays refresh rates are the real FPS killer. In MCDU you can find the option to change target FPS for Displays. I set mine 2D Displays target to minimum possible(5 i belive)since i don't use them, and VC Displays to 15(i can't remember but default is higher anyway). Tried with VC Displays target FPS set to 5 - not nice for my eyes, but FSX fps are rock stable at 30(and i have them locked at 30). It's nice that you can change them at any time, so you can set them higher in cruise, and lower for approach when you need more FPS. I just did an approach(FPS hungry addon scenery)with target fps for displays set to 5, and my FSX FPS was stable even during rollout(usually during this phase fps was very low, arround 20 or less). So give it a try and report your results
  19. Michal Trzaska

    Fluctuating FPS

    Hi, I have a weird issue with FPS, basically it is around 25-30 in VC, on my AMD 8250 / Geforce 980, but every 20-25 seconds it drops down for about 5-8 seconds, and after that it returns back to 25 - 30. In 2D cockpit it is similar, I have 50-60 FPS and every 20 - 25 seconds it drops down to 18-20. Any ideas to this? best regards
  20. Terblanche

    Cockpit Lights and FPS

    Anybody else noticed the drop in FPS when you switch on the cockpit lights ...? Without lights at EDDM (T2G) the FPS are 28.2 and the moment you switch on the lights it drops to 20 FPS. The spotlights have an affect on FPS that I've noticed when added to PMDG aircraft but not this much. For an aircraft that already has a huge impact on FPS, this drop because of lights seems exceptional. Do not want to sound as every little detail is scrutinise and bemoaned on the forum because I'm a more than happy customer. Just trying to get a good balance between performance and quality by squeezing every little bite out of 32-bit. Let's go flying again. Terblanche if
  21. Ralf Reuß

    FSX A320 crashes (VAS), etc.

    I'm really disappointed !! It can not be that I have to reduce everything to start a plane without crashing? Even with aircraft of PMDG there are no such problems. I as a user have a feeling I was working as a beta tester, whether new CFG file Ramsoftware or other settings, and I speak here of hours with my Flight Club in the group all has nothing helped real. So I delete all favorite airports again? The same applies to traffic. Without traffic, it is not fun !! On the Internet you will find closed threads and no one has a perfect solution. If you write to the support, the answer is a link to the forum. This is a support ?? So can this aircraft apparently only without Scenery, traffic and without installed addons operate ?? Not with me!! My holiday I have enough already sacrificed so !! I want to give the aircraft within the right to return back !!!! Ich bin wirklich enttäuscht !! Es kann doch nicht sein, dass ich alles reduzieren muss um ein Flugzeug ohne Absturz zu starten? Auch mit Flugzeugen von PMDG gibt es nicht solche Probleme. Ich als Benutzer habe das Gefühl, das ich als Beta-Tester funktioniere, ob neue CFG-Datei, Ramsoftware oder sonstige Einstellungen und ich spreche hier von Stunden mit meinem Flight Club in der Gruppe alles hat nichts wirkliche geholfen. Also lösche ich alle Lieblings Flughäfen wieder? Das gleiche gilt für den Verkehr. Ohne Verkehr macht es keinen Spaß !! Im Internet finden Sie geschlossene Threads und niemand hat eine perfekte Lösung. Wenn Sie an den Support schreiben, ist die Antwort ein Link zum Forum. Das ist eine Unterstützung ?? Also kann man dieses Flugzeug scheinbar nur ohne Scenery, Verkehr und ohne installierte Addons betreiben?? Nicht mit mir!! Mein Urlaub habe ich schon genug damit geopfert!! Ich möchte das Flugzeug innerhalb der Rückgaberecht zurück zu geben !!!!
  22. diditopgun

    [Resolved] - Mouse cursor and FPS loss

    Hi ! As mentioned, when mouse cursor auto-hide a FPS gain occur. In flight with mouse cursor hidden I have a stable 30FPS. But every time I move the cursor I can lost up to 10FPS... What's the technical reason of this fps lost ? Do you think it can be improved in the future ?
  23. Ramón Cutanda

    How To Get The Most Out Your Pc

    First, apply Bojote's tweaks: http://www.venetubo.com/fsx.html They really work GREAT and will do wonders for most of you. The only thing I'd rather not do is to use an external limiter. I prefer the internal FSX's limiter to 30 fps. Then I always apply this nVidia Inspector for my nVidia graphics card: If you don't mind to get you hands "dirty", then the AVSIM Software and Hardware Guide for FSX is a MUST Appart from that, I always TURN OFF land and sea traffic, which hits very had on FPS. Also, I have to lower autogen to normal or lower in complex sceneries in order to avoid OOM (Out Of Memory) errors. See here.If running My Traffic X like me NEVER set it avobe 40-50%, specially in busy airports, when about 30% gives you plenty of traffic. These simple things really changed my simming experience. Bests,
  24. ialej95

    Fps Impact

    Hey FSL team, Do your product have an important impact on FSX framerate? In the virtual cockpit for example? Very looking foward this product, THE FSL A320!!! Thank's a lot Alex
  • Create New...