All Activity
This stream auto-updates
- Past hour
-
Let's go to the Winchester, wait for it all blow over & while we are there LK might release it. Too soon? Okay, *walks out backwards smiling awkwardly*
-
As much as I love FSElite, they aren't professional journalists or anything. They often bulk up their pieces with subjective opinions or editorialize what should otherwise be a straightforward news story. Most of the time, it's best to skip straight to their source links rather than read their interpretations. But I do depend on them to gather the news I might otherwise miss.
-
You are right. But in all fairness... it can’t be that of a surprise that Some people take one of the biggest and most respected news services in the „industry“ as a reliable source for information.... It wasn‘t just some opinion of some blogger....
-
The article contains absolutely no indication that FSLabs have given FSElite any information about the release date. As the article says at the end: "We expect Flight Sim Labs to release the A321-X variant very soon" - We being the staff at FSElite...
- Today
-
Wording is from the author but the information they get given came from fslabs i'm not the kind of people who spam this thread blaming you guys but it just would have been nice to have clear statement from fslabs than an apparently different reality that you said to fselite
-
Maybe cause they get given more information and exclusive preview than we do...
-
Hi @Julien31480 As you probably know that wording came from the article's author rather than from us. On an aside, please change your forum name to be your real name thanks.
-
Exactly, but then why to believe fselite in this case even it's not the developer for A321X?
-
some traffic going to london airspace.
- 1319 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- Screenshot
- Random
- (and 4 more)
-
From Abuja home to Munich:
- 1319 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- Screenshot
- Random
- (and 4 more)
-
AnthonyCocomazzi changed their profile photo
-
Hello norman, To be honest with you i think the fselite previex saying that the release will be very very soon make everyone impatient on the release on the 321 and i think it would have been nice to have some clarification about how fslabs is dealing with that as we have youre side where you say its gonna be ready when its gonna be ready and the fselite side saying the release is gonna be really soon wich create lots of confusion for a lot of us.
-
Jannick Hald joined the community
-
Google
-
Source
-
Here's another real A321 photo to look at until release. Stay tuned for tomorrow's A321 photo
-
Hello Paolo, I would check the batteries in your calendar. Cosford was exactly 2 months ago this weekend. Whilst you may have wished for it at that time we never said it would be - in fact we said the opposite and that it was only entering beta. Just because we allowed people to fly it there did not mean it was ready. Hi Norman, I actually just checked the batteries in my calendar and they are dead, so my apologies to everyone if i was wrong, i do not mean in anyway to offend or demand the product if it's not ready yet, it's just that we get a little bit excited before Christmas and therefore when ever we here the word SOON we think it's around the corner, So my apologies again and good luck with the build up. Regards Paolo
-
What‘s your issue? The FSL A321 will be a CEO, so no long-haul capabilities anyway. The A330-300 is made for a totally different mission profile, hence certainty not everybody is going to buy an A330 instead of an A321. How this could even be a business consideration is beyond me.
-
I frankly don‘t understand this obsession with the A321 some people exhibit here, constantly asking and nagging for progress reports and status. Yes, we‘re all anticipating it, but there‘s an excellent A319/320 to keep us busy while waiting. I personally could not care less for PBR, and also the CPDLC will probably not be that useful for me as an offline-only flyer, but let‘s see. If we‘re going to see a fully implemented S7/S8 FMGC software standard (with step climbs, exit hold time predictions, etc.) along with the A321 I‘d be all ear, especially when that gets implemented back into the A319/320. The real killer would be the A321(X)LR, which would open the door to long range operations, just as in real life.
-
Hello Paolo, I would check the batteries in your calendar. Cosford was exactly 2 months ago this weekend. Whilst you may have wished for it at that time we never said it would be - in fact we said the opposite and that it was only entering beta. Just because we allowed people to fly it there did not mean it was ready.
-
Ah, I love this entitlement. You don’t ‘deserve’ anything apart from support for the products you’ve actually paid for. You’ve not paid a penny for the A321 so what makes you think you have any right to demand news of it? Here is what you should know. FSLabs will release the A321 when it’s ready. They’ll release news of it when it’s ready. They won’t give timelines and they won’t give hints. Your impatience is yours alone. Don’t blame FSLabs for it.
-
"PMCO - Pilot Monitoring Callouts" - ask and discuss HERE
Peter Pukhnoy replied to NilsUnger's topic in General Discussion
@Huy Khoa Nguyen Verify that the Path entry in the Sounds section of FSUIPC5.ini points to the sound folder of your simulator. -
Not working well with PMDG NGXu
Lefteris Kalamaras replied to mark niebauer's topic in FSL Spotlights
Is anyone else having issues there? Or with any other PBR aircraft? -
Not working well with PMDG NGXu
Lefteris Kalamaras replied to mark niebauer's topic in FSL Spotlights
Good thing that you opened a new thread, because you still have not responded to my last one - I was asking: "Do you have any other aircraft where FSLSpotlights doesn't work? What is the observed issue with PBR textures exactly? " -
Great thanks for the info,
-
Tbf we only got information on features that we might see. Those are PBR, new performance calculator and cpdlc. Now the new performance system is being tested as well on the a320 beta that is out for the beta testers as well. Ie not for the public. Just to make sure this is correctly seen. My thoughts on that is people want to enjoy better take off performance as wabpro is dead in development. As for other features those they want to keep a surprise to us.
-
"PMCO - Pilot Monitoring Callouts" - ask and discuss HERE
Huy Khoa Nguyen replied to NilsUnger's topic in General Discussion
Hi, After checking the log file, I see that it read correctly the values however, there was no sound during the take off, you have any idea ? Log file is above Thanks
.thumb.jpg.2dd38934bbadffc26bdf3b1dc006d66b.jpg)