All Activity
This stream auto-updates
- Past hour
-
I'm most excited for the EFB whenever that comes. Actually really most excited to fly this plane again. I've switched over fully to V5. So I'm patiently awaiting the return of the top dog in my hangar.
-
I am not Felipe in anyway or shape but system depth you should have ago on the leonardo maddog She’s a handful everytime
-
Question in regards to Sharklet expansion
Norman Blackburn replied to STEFAN DORDEVIC's topic in General Forum
You can buy them all at one go should you wish @STEFAN DORDEVIC -
BA ops today LHR-INV-LHR-MXP
- Today
-
Whats is EIS1? This is EIS for me And I never took only 1!
-
I´d rather have EIS1 than sharklets and I´d pay all the 150€ again für just EIS1
-
Christian Myrstad joined the community
-
Who needs EIS1? Can we just have those Sharkies?!
-
Felipe - just out of curiosity - what's on par/better? I'm asking because I think I'm clearly missing out on something, so I'd really like to know!
-
- 2187 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- Screenshot
- Random
- (and 4 more)
-
it was a joke mate... Debatable. I do not think so, having used a variety of add-ons extensively for more than a decade now.
-
I hope so Steve but I’m still keeping my fingers crossed. You okay and still flying?
-
Are there any plans to make the additional A321XLR
Michele Benedetti replied to Bill Brewer's topic in General Discussion
Really? I’ m in no way a coding expert so I made that assumption just basing on appearance...by prohibitive I meant that I think it would be a performance killer to have all those screens each with a mouse cursor in it...let’s hope FSLabs finds a way... -
I’m glad you’ve got to the bottom of this Ray....let’s hope this finally solves the problem. Anyway all the best.
-
It’s a strange system used for FSDT products but overall it seems to work well once you understand its idiosyncrasies. Hard to say at this point whether GSX or SODE is the culprit. The easiest way to find out is to activate SODE for v4 and see what happens. Andrew was on the right track with his suggestion to uninstall both and then reinstall but it seems that only works for so long before it needs doing again. But if disabling 64-bit SODE before starting P3Dv3 is the solution that’s easy enough to do. As things stand I’m a lot happier today than yesterday.
-
ENGM-EGLL completed without any issues. Things are looking up. Two out of two. I won't make any changes for a few more flights but eventually GSX and SODE are going to be needed for v4. Given SODE is automatically installed by GSX I don't have much control over that but I will unregister and disable SODE when flying Concorde. Maybe it being active has some bearing. All in all a useful session and I'm grateful for the advice and to Ramon for his testing. If anyone fancies Oslo to Heathrow in 1h 9m and that's with a 09R landing let me know. Remaining VAS after landing was 624Mb and that's after flying over northern London and with 212 Ai in a 40nm bubble around the aircraft.
-
@Ray Proudfoot Without knowing the details of GSX and SODE, I remember that the few times that I experienced CTDs (with Majestic Q400), uninstalling and reinstalling GSX contributed to solving the problem. It's important not to do just a live update, but to download the newest full version and to uninstall the old one. No idea what is going on inside.
-
@Ramón Cutanda I absolutely understand that disclosing more details about FS2020 would infringe the NDA, so I won't address that sim until the latter is lifted, but I sincerely hope that FSL Concorde 64 bit will be offered for at least any of the new simulators in the future. I still use P3Dv3 as my primary sim and will probably do so until P3Dv5 will improve and/or FS2020 will be released, at which point I would upgrade my hardware. Aside from the VAS limitation, it is possible to make P3Dv3 look good in combination with ORBX and Envtex/Envshade. I personally like to have some more eye candy on my arrivals including cars on highways and AI traffic at airports, but given that I merely use a screen with a resolution of 1680x1050, it doesn't stress the VAS so much, which allows me to dial the graphics up a little bit. If you use the ORBX regions you will run out of memory without reducing the settings considerably, but OpenLC works just fine. Too bad that my computer is in the country where I have my job, while I am in a different country right now without being able to travel due to the situation. I miss flying Concorde. Happy that I could make fuel planning easier for you with my files.
-
concerns about missing features of FMGC
Camille MOUCHEL replied to Camille MOUCHEL's topic in General Discussion
agreed, especially the one that are quite used ie Step/climb, desncent, ETP and offset: I would easily pay 20e more to get those 3 features -
concerns about missing features of FMGC
B_r_u_n_o-R_o_l_o replied to Camille MOUCHEL's topic in General Discussion
I feel the same, Offset is being used IRL, matter of fact I just saw it in action a few weeks ago while jumpseating on a 320. I created a thread a few weeks ago, but no response from FSL. Personally I care more about the missing features that @Camille MOUCHEL described at the top of his post than PDC/CPDLC (good luck finding this in the U.S) or EFB, Sharklet, etc. I understand that it makes more sense commercially for FSL to release Shacklets, however these missing features have been requested since the early adopters days.... </rant> -
I have the exact same attitude to how the sim looks. At 60,000ft there's nothing to see anyway!
-
.thumb.png.a1f692e6b68c0c56da114f6a7fe670fa.png)
Rodrigo Araújo changed their profile photo
-
My improved (I believe) Concorde X checklist
Ramón Cutanda replied to Ramón Cutanda's topic in Concorde-X
SIMPLIFIED CHECKLISTS v2.0.5 - 27/May/2020 • Revised ADS/ENGINE PROBE HEATERS check during COCKPIT SAFETY CHECK • Some minor typos fixed EXTENDED CHECKLISTS v2.0.5 - 27/May/2020 (v2.0.4 was only released for the simplified checklist) • Revised ADS/ENGINE PROBE HEATERS check during COCKPIT SAFETY CHECK • INTAKE PANEL CHECK -> revised • FWD LIGHTS test -> revised • NOZZLE light off -> check revised • Observe ESS main isolate MIs show inline -> Moved to DC Electrics Panel (was in AC Panel by mistake) • AP light (red) and AT light (red) on revised on WARNING AND LANDING DISPLAY TEST • MASTER WARNING LIGHTS TEST, relocated from "Main" to "Fwd Overhead VC" • Correction of CROSSBLEED BALVES 1&4 and ENGINES 4&1 START sequence order • Some minor typos fixed -
PETR BEZDEK joined the community
-
.thumb.jpg.2dd38934bbadffc26bdf3b1dc006d66b.jpg)
Are there any plans to make the additional A321XLR
Robert Sutherland replied to Bill Brewer's topic in General Discussion
Well, the good news is that they’ve made it clear the fixes and additional features are on the roadmap. They’ve not disclosed anything about future projects other than saying an unnamed one is in early development. -
Question in regards to Sharklet expansion
STEFAN DORDEVIC replied to STEFAN DORDEVIC's topic in General Forum
Thanks for replying,just one more thing... Does the fslabs store support multiple buys so that I can buy A320 and A321 at once and having to go back at the product page. Thanks for your time and help, Stefan D. -
Question in regards to Sharklet expansion
Camille MOUCHEL replied to STEFAN DORDEVIC's topic in General Forum
didn't get your last past but thanks for the info, I have all fslabs A32X aircraft so wouldn't be an issue for me haha -
Question in regards to Sharklet expansion
Norman Blackburn replied to STEFAN DORDEVIC's topic in General Forum
Yes. But the A321-X will still be required. Unless of course you want use to change that attractive price for you?
